The stewards decisions become more blatantly biased by the minute it seems. Since Max appointed Allan Donnelly to 'assist' the stewards in coming to quicker decisions at the start of the season it seems the decision making process has been reduced to questioning the colour of the cars.

I cannot imagine that Lewis Hamilton wold have been alllowed to drive round for lap after lap with an exhaust pipe hanging off the car.

Lewis got a penalty for keeping a position by cutting a chicane. Jarno kept a position by pushing Heikki off the track albeit only by a foot or two. How can it be considered more serious to miss a chicane than to nudge a car off the track? Imagine that was Hamilton in Trulli's postion and Raikkonen in Kovalainen's. I think we would have had a different decision.

We managed for decades without a drive through penalty so it is ludicrous that they are now being handed out like Smarties.

I cannot fathom how Heikki could be accused of blocking Mark Webber. He did everything he could to get out of the way but the incident happend in Q2 and both Mark and himself made it to Q3 so it did not affect qualifying positions at all.

The only decision the stewards have had to make in the past two races where the decision was absolutely crystal clear was to show the black and orange flag to Raikkonen. No matter how you look at it that decision could only possibly go one way if there was a fair decision making process and it was decidedly not the way it went on Sunday. How can the FIA possibly justify not even telling Ferrari to remove the offending piece during their routine pitstop?

By the same token you can also ask why is it always Mclaren that are disputing their penalties, why must it always be a controversy?

Lewis himself said that he would have crashed into Vettel had he not cutted the chicane, and Vettel thought the penalty was fair, what about his opinion doesn't it count for anything? The problem is the pass wouldn't have sticked if he didn't cut the the chicane. Heikki's penalty was a bit unfortunate. Lewis and properly Mclaren should take a leave out of Heikki's book he didn't complain or questioned the penalty, he accepted it. (And he a reasonable job during the race)

All drivers sometimes receive penalties that at times seems unfair, a good example is Kubica last year in Japan. You can also ask why are Mclaren always putting themselves in position to receive penalties?

Kimi received a drive through penalty in Monaco for not having his tyres fitted in advance. Ferrari only missed the cut off time by 2 seconds. Ferrari could have stated afterwards that the penalty was unfair. They could have said something along the lines off that it was only 2 seconds, technically 2 seconds isn't really over the time 1 minute can be seen as over the time. They could also have said that if it wasn't for the penalty, Kimi could have scored more points and he wouldn't have been stuck behind Sutil. But they didn't, all of them accepted it without saying a word afterwards. In every situation you can say many things, but it doesn't really change anything.

At the moment Mclaren seems to be concentrating on the wrong things. After every race it seems like they are trying to convince everyone that they did noting wrong, and they could have won if only....

It seems like the PR agenda is stipulated to always show everyone that they are always right and that they never make mistakes. Somewhere along the line they should admit their mistakes review them, learn from them, and move on. At this moment it seems like they are always concentrating on all the wrongs done against them and what could have been, instead of just quietly moving on to the next race. Even some of the die hard Mclaren fans are starting to doubt their approach.

That is exactly the problem, why are Mclaren always debating everything, often about things that are clear cut. Sometimes it just better to admit when you are wrong and move on.