Back to the future
AerodynamicsNext year (2009) will see the biggest shake up in the aero regulations for 10 years. That means the cars will probably look quite a bit different to their 2008 brethren. We won't quite get back to the MP4/7 (pictured) but it could look more like that than you may think!

Make no mistake the 2009 cars will look a lot different to their 2008 cousins. Okay, they'll still have four wheels, a raised nose, a front wing, sidepods and a rear wing but all those elements could look substantially different.
However the thrust is to try to increase mechanical grip at the expense of aero grip. The theory is that it will make passing easier. The mechanism to achieve this is to add mechanical grip through wider, slick tyres and reduce downforce by about 50%.
It should be noted that the 2009 regs have yet to be finalised. Of course they could change but the principles have been agreed among the teams and the sense in the paddock is that we are a month or so away from a freeze.
Let's take each element in turn and see what the proposed changes are.
Front wing
The plan is to lower the front wing and widen it from 145cm to 180cm, like the car seen in the main picture!
The idea here is to create more downforce at the front in turbulent air. By lowering the wing the air will be cleaner and the downforce greater because of the ground effect. By making the wing wider it will be able to generate more downforce.
The only downside is that as cars try to pass expect more incidents involving front wings. After the first lap it would not be too much of a surprise to see 5 cars in the pits getting new noses!
Also the centre of the front wing will be a standard part — the various spoons and shovel shapes will be a thing of the past. Again this is to control downforce at the front.
The other proposal is a little more controversial and involves a movable aero device. Two flaps will be included that the driver can move by 6 degrees twice a lap. The idea here is that when the following car is trying to pass, the driver can ratchet up the downforce on the big straight to further negate the effect of being in the dirty air.
Rear wing
The rear wing will be narrower and higher. It is thought the width will reduce from 100cm to 80cm and the height will increase from 80cm to 95cm.
The reduced width will see downforce at the rear of the car cut significantly. This will also affect how teams set up the front wing so as to maintain balance; front downforce will need to be lower too. The increase in height is designed to get the wing out of the dirty air when in the overtaking zone — the theory is that there is less upwash from the forward car. Whether that will work remains to be seen but I assume the CFD simulations suggest improvement.
The number of elements will also be restricted, probably to two. Again this will serve to reduce rear downforce.
Diffuser
The diffuser is critical for generating underbody downforce. In 2009 the diffuser will be shortened (by half a wheel length) and will be higher. This actually has the effect of increased nominal downforce under the car and is subject to fewer disturbances when following a car.
One important aspect of a 2008 diffuser is the way it interacts with the rear wing (the lower element creates a low pressure zone by the diffuser, which draws air out). With the raising of the wing this effect will be less.
Winglets etc.
Winglets, which quite frankly make the current crop of cars look ugly, will be banned. This will mean that some body downforce will be lost but, more importantly, there will be fewer vortex generators.
Vortices break up the wake severely, so this should act to clean up the air behind the car a little.
Tyres
Although still up for debate, the odds are that the boots will be slicks and wider! This will serve to increase mechanical grip substantially — three to four seconds a lap — and ease overtaking
Conclusions
The thrust of the new regs is clear: more mechanical grip + less aero grip = more overtaking.
Although not perfect, 2009 should be a better show than 2008 is shaping up to be. Also, as all the teams are starting from a zero base the grid could be significantly different.
We've only skimmed through the new rules but as they are firmed up we'll spend more time picking them apart.
So what could a 2009 car look like. Here is one interpretation of the rules — interesting eh?
Teams | Drivers
Delicious
Digg
StumbleUpon
Reddit
Assuming the regs go forward
Assuming the regs go forward as they stand I don't see it making a huge difference. The front wing is still going to work much better in clean air than in a turbulent flow so that gives a following car a problem.
The adjustable flaps are just an incredibly stupid idea. All the drivers are going to operate them at exactly the same points on the circuit and it will become as routine as changing gear. To me it is just another useless device that can break and penalise someone or something else the driver can do wrong. They will contribute nothing positive.
I cannot understand how the FIA can take simple situations and make them stupidly complex. Every wing that every team ever makes will have to be checked to see if the central spoon conforms to the template. There will be manufacturing tolerance in the rules and teams are going to push the limit of those and beyond. All they had to say was that the leading and trailing edges must be flat and if necessary dictate that wing profile must be the same along its length. Instead of that we are not doubt going to have endless arguments about how the teams have incorporated the standard element with its complex shape. It reminds me of the whole fuel temperature fiasco. The fuel has to be within 10 degrees of ambient temperature but ambient isn't specified. All they had to do was give a set temperature for the fuel.
The move back to slicks is definitely right as is the change in emphasis from aero to mechanical grip albeit they haven't gone anywhere near far enough. Of course it was Max who dragged the sport down the path of more aero, less mechanical grip and it has taken him years to figure out it was an idiotic idea when the rest of the population knew it was stupid the second we heard it. Yet there are still people trying to argue he has done a great job as President. He has done a great job for Ferrari but that is all.
09 regs
Stephen -- I agree with you on the front wing point. Of course being in the dirty air will still be problematic. And I don't think we'll see a Mclaren overtaking a Ferrari. But we could see a McLaren overtake a Renault for instance. The regs will have some effect ... but not *that* much.
My understanding of the flaps is that they'll probably only be used by the following car when following on a possible overtaking straight -- this will give more downforce in dirty air. The car in front may use them on a different part of the circuit -- in a tight corner. Either way it probably won't make much difference